Dear Daniele,
Here is the files. please refer it.
Thanks.
Out of memory in Static Dielectric Matrix calculation
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan, Nicola Spallanzani
Forum rules
If you have trouble compiling Yambo, please make sure to list:
(1) the compiler (vendor and release: e.g. intel 10.1)
(2) the architecture (e.g. 64-bit IBM SP5)
(3) if the problems occur compiling in serial/in parallel
(4) the version of Yambo (revision number/major release version)
(5) the relevant compiler error message
If you have trouble compiling Yambo, please make sure to list:
(1) the compiler (vendor and release: e.g. intel 10.1)
(2) the architecture (e.g. 64-bit IBM SP5)
(3) if the problems occur compiling in serial/in parallel
(4) the version of Yambo (revision number/major release version)
(5) the relevant compiler error message
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:03 am
Re: Out of memory in Static Dielectric Matrix calculation
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dr. Yimin Ding
Soochow University, China.
Soochow University, China.
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:13 am
Re: Out of memory in Static Dielectric Matrix calculation
Dear All,
a couple of comments related to the ongoing discussion:
* typically, negative size allocation means that the global size of the array to be allocated (the product of each rank dimension) goes overflow (larger than 4Byte integers, about 2*10^9 elements);
* the code stops for the allocation size being negative, but that could be somehow random, which could also explain some different behaviours when changing the dimensions of the problem;
* would this situation fit ?
Andrea
a couple of comments related to the ongoing discussion:
* typically, negative size allocation means that the global size of the array to be allocated (the product of each rank dimension) goes overflow (larger than 4Byte integers, about 2*10^9 elements);
* the code stops for the allocation size being negative, but that could be somehow random, which could also explain some different behaviours when changing the dimensions of the problem;
* would this situation fit ?
Andrea
Andrea Ferretti, PhD
CNR-NANO-S3 and MaX Centre
via Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy
Tel: +39 059 2055322; Skype: andrea_ferretti
URL: http://www.nano.cnr.it
CNR-NANO-S3 and MaX Centre
via Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy
Tel: +39 059 2055322; Skype: andrea_ferretti
URL: http://www.nano.cnr.it
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:03 am
Re: Out of memory in Static Dielectric Matrix calculation
Dear Andrea,
Thanks for your reply.
I think so.
Best,
Thanks for your reply.
I think so.
Best,
Dr. Yimin Ding
Soochow University, China.
Soochow University, China.